WELCOME TO THE STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING OFFICE HOMEPAGE.

This learning page is a great place to find information about training, learning portfolios, and get helpful tips on customer service, managing employees, or other library issues. We'll also be posting post-conference reflections and ideas discovered by staff members at programs they attended.

Subscribe to the blog to get updates when ideas are posted.

Monday, July 15, 2019

ALA 2019 - Defining the Educational Role


My first ALA  Conference was a whirlwind of excitement and information as I traveled from one session to the next, finding time to engage with a few of my favorite authors along the way. Among those sessions was one that really stuck with me: I attended Defining and Embracing the Instructional Role for Youth Services Librarians.  The thesis of this session was that teaching and learning are already core elements of public service.  We, as public librarians, are already “educators.”  But, to quote the session, “by explicitly framing our work as instruction, we can ensure that this teaching and learning is empowering, equitable and enjoyable.” 

But what does that mean? 

Formal learning environments, like schools, follow state or national standards.  Common Core is an example of this.  Using these standards as a background, the educator can set a clear measurable outcome for instruction.  “Students will be able to…”  If at the end of the lesson they are “unable to…”, the lesson was unsuccessful.  So, how do we translate this to public librarianship and how can we implement this at Pratt?

As we go through this transitional period and begin to re-evaluate how we do many things here at Pratt, one topic that I hear repeatedly brought up is “programming.”  What makes an effective program?  How do we evaluate if a program is successful?  How can we tie programming into our organization's goals?  For all of these questions, I believe it comes down to our role as educators.  It starts with a change in the language.  Other library systems are already doing this.  One our neighbors calls their librarians and library associates “instructors.”  Programs are called “classes.”  It is this synchronicity in terminology with the schools that helps cement their association.

For most, coming to a library program is “fun” not “educational”... or is it? By changing our terminology, we change the expectation.  This session showed, it’s as simple as adopting standards and re-framing the way we present ourselves.  We as public librarians at Pratt provide so much instruction that it seems a shame we cannot quantify it.  

Session leaders made sure to specify that any formalized organization standard could be used as the framework for outcomes, including a library system’s strategic plan.  Because the session was geared toward those involved in young adult and children’s services, they used the framework of the YALSA Teen First: Basic Learning Outcomes.  The six categories: community, creativity, digital citizenship, leadership, learning and literacies all list outcomes that can be adopted for library programming.  In using these guidelines as the outcomes for programming, it becomes easier to evaluate the programs’ effectiveness.  The best part?  It doesn’t require anyone to do anything major. 

The first step during program planning is to ask the questions:  “What is my outcome?”  “What competencies can I use to evaluate my outcome?”  I’ll give you an example.  One of our branches is having a Dungeons and Dragons program.  Their original description states: “Journey through fantastic realms and battle ferocious beasts through the magic of D&D. No prior table-top experience required.”  Using this new approach, we would post an outcome at the program like “Teen participants will collaborate with others using materials provided to create an original adventure through the realms of Dungeons and Dragons.”  In this instance, we’ve utilized three of the learning outcomes and still done the same program.  Plus, now that we have an established outcome it is much easier to evaluate if the program was effective or not. 

I am not saying that this is something we must do, but as the conversation is moving forward about programming, this might be something to consider in the future.


Read more:
Instruction & pedagogy for youth in public libraries http://publiclibraryinstruction.web.unc.edu/

Jamequa Summerall
Collection Management


No comments:

Post a Comment